US 'must target Pakistan havens'
America is beefing up its troops in Afghanistan
The chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff has called for a new strategy in Afghanistan to deny militants bases across the border in Pakistan.
Speaking on the eve of the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, Admiral Mike Mullen called for a military strategy that covered both sides of the border.
The US must work closely with Pakistan to "eliminate [the enemy's] safe havens", he told Congress.
But Pakistan insists it will not allow foreign forces onto its territory.
"There is no question of any agreement or understanding with the coalition forces whereby they are allowed to conduct operations on our side of the border," Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff, Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, said.
However, the New York Times newspaper reported on Wednesday that President George Bush had approved orders in July to allow US Special Operations forces to carry out ground assaults inside Pakistan without Pakistani approval.
"The situation in the tribal areas is not tolerable," an unnamed senior US official told the newspaper. "We have to be more assertive. Orders have been given."
A surge of US attacks in Pakistan's border region over the past week has prompted outrage from the government and army.
The Joy of Trump
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Pakistan Havens
US 'must target Pakistan havens'
America is beefing up its troops in Afghanistan
The chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff has called for a new strategy in Afghanistan to deny militants bases across the border in Pakistan.
Speaking on the eve of the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, Admiral Mike Mullen called for a military strategy that covered both sides of the border.
The US must work closely with Pakistan to "eliminate [the enemy's] safe havens", he told Congress.
But Pakistan insists it will not allow foreign forces onto its territory.
"There is no question of any agreement or understanding with the coalition forces whereby they are allowed to conduct operations on our side of the border," Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff, Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, said.
However, the New York Times newspaper reported on Wednesday that President George Bush had approved.
America is beefing up its troops in Afghanistan
The chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff has called for a new strategy in Afghanistan to deny militants bases across the border in Pakistan.
Speaking on the eve of the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, Admiral Mike Mullen called for a military strategy that covered both sides of the border.
The US must work closely with Pakistan to "eliminate [the enemy's] safe havens", he told Congress.
But Pakistan insists it will not allow foreign forces onto its territory.
"There is no question of any agreement or understanding with the coalition forces whereby they are allowed to conduct operations on our side of the border," Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff, Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, said.
However, the New York Times newspaper reported on Wednesday that President George Bush had approved.
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
The Navaho word hozho, translated into English as “beauty,” also means harmony, wholeness, goodness. One story that suggests the dynamic way that beauty comes alive between us concerns a contemporary Navajo weaver. “A man ordered a rug of an especially complex pattern on two separate occasions from the same weaver. Both rugs came out perfectly and the weaver remarked to her brother that there must have been something special about the owner. It was understood that the outcome of the rugs was dependent not on the weaver’s skill and ability but upon the hozho in the owners life. The hozho of his life evoked the beauty in the rugs. In the Navaho world view, beauty exists not simply in the object, or in the artist who made the object; it is expressed in relationships.
- J. Ruth Gendler, Notes on the Need for Beauty
Doublespeak
In the same talk Harper says we're out but not quite. We'll stay on as technical advisors. Maybe he should look at the statistics of how many foreign aid workers are being targeted and killed.
Harper says 2011 'end date' for Afghanistan mission
'The mission, as we've known it, we intend to end,' PM tells reporters
A decade at war is enough, Conservative Leader Stephen Harper said on Wednesday. (Tom Hanson/Canadian Press)
Canada will withdraw the bulk of its military forces in Afghanistan as scheduled in 2011, Conservative Leader Stephen Harper pledged on Wednesday, saying the Afghan government "at some point has to be able to be primarily responsible" for the country's security.
Speaking to reporters at a breakfast briefing in Toronto, Harper said the Canadian public has no appetite to keep soldiers in the war-torn country any longer than the pullout date agreed on by Parliament.
"You have to put an end date on these things," Harper said.
He added that while Canada's military leaders have not acknowledged it publicly, a decade of war is enough.
"By 2011, we will have been in Kandahar, which is probably the toughest province in the country, for six years," Harper said.
"Not only have we done our bit at that point, I think our goal has to be after six years to see the government of Afghanistan able to carry the lion's share of responsibility for its own security.
"At that point, the mission, as we've known it, we intend to end."
Troops would stay 'in some technical capacities'
The Tory government, supported by the Liberals, extended the military mission in Kandahar province to 2011 earlier this year, with a shift to emphasize the mission's priorities to reconstruction and development in the region.
Saturday, September 6, 2008
Google chrome
Chrome a serious challenger in browser battle
By David Pogue
Thursday, September 4, 2008
Does the world really need another Web browser? Google thinks so. Chrome, its new browser, was developed in secrecy and released to the world Tuesday. The Windows version is available for download now at google.com/chrome; the Mac and Linux versions will take a little longer.
Google argues that current Web browsers were designed eons ago, before so many of the developments that characterize today's Web: video everywhere, scams and spyware, viruses that lurk even on legitimate sites, Web-based games and ambitious Web-based programs like Google's own Docs word processor.
As Google's blog puts it, "We realized that the Web had evolved from mainly simple text pages to rich, interactive applications and that we needed to completely rethink the browser."
What this early version of Chrome accomplishes isn't quite that grand. But it is a first-rate beginning.
With no status bar, no menu bar and only a single toolbar (for bookmarks), Chrome is minimalist in the extreme.
Some might even call it stripped-down. This initial version is labeled "beta," meaning still in testing. True, Google labels almost everything beta - the four-year-old Gmail program is still in beta - but this time it's serious.
At the moment, for example, there's no way to e-mail a Web page to someone, no full-screen mode, no way to magnify the page (rather than just the text), and no screen for organizing bookmarks. Google says that these features are at the top of its to-do list.
Chrome is, nonetheless, full of really smart features that seem to have been inspired by other browsers - or ripped off from them, depending on your level of cynicism.
Take the address bar. As you start to type, a menu of suggestions appears immediately beneath - a list culled not just from pages you have already visited, but also from your bookmarks, search suggestions and popular Web pages that you haven't been to before. That works even the first time you try it, since Chrome auto-imports your bookmarks, history and even stored passwords from your old browser. (See also: the similar address bars in Firefox and Internet Explorer 8, also now in beta testing.)
If you have ever searched Amazon, eBay, or other popular sites, another cool shortcut awaits. You can just type the site's first letter in the address bar and then press Tab. Do that with "A," for example, and the address bar changes to "Search amazon.com," allowing you to search within that site without even going there first. You've saved one big step.
As your start-up page, Chrome displays pictures of nine mini-Web pages, representing your most frequently visited sites. (See also: the Speed Dial feature on the Opera browser.)
This start-up page also lists several of your most recently visited sites and searches, making it a natural, time-saving starting point. (You can designate a more standard Home page if you prefer by clicking on the Options command that hides in one of the two menu icons.)
The "Create application shortcuts" command (also hiding in those menus) generates an icon on your desktop. When you click it, the corresponding site opens without the usual address bar and buttons - in other words, it now works exactly like a regular desktop program. For services like Gmail or blogging software, this feature further blurs the line between online and offline software.
Downloading files is really easy. A status button appears at the bottom of your browser window - there is no Downloads window to get in your way. You click that button to open the downloaded file, without having to worry about what folder it wound up in.
If you believe Google, though, the best stuff is all under the hood. For example, Google chose, as the underlying Web-page processing software, the same existing "rendering engine" inside Apple's Safari browser.
As a result, Chrome is quick - faster than Internet Explorer, although not quite as fast as Firefox or Safari. Since Chrome came out on Tuesday, I haven't had time to test it on all 40 billion Web pages on the Internet (I gave up around dinnertime).
Very few Web sites gave Chrome problems, though. NBCOlympics.com, for example, failed to recognize Chrome and therefore refused to play its videos, but that will change; nobody ignores Google these days.
Also under the hood are what Google considers some of Chrome's most important features - the security enhancements. Google says that each tab runs in its own "sandbox," so that if there's nasty spyware-type software running on one Web site, it has no access to the rest of your computer, or even the other tabs. Google asserts that this is much stronger protection than Internet Explorer 8 gives you, especially in Windows XP. (Internet Explorer 8 supplies its best protection only in Windows Vista.)
Also in the security category, something called Incognito mode, in which no cookies, passwords or cache files are saved, and the browser's History list records no trace of your activity. (See also: Safari, Internet Explorer 8.) Google cheerfully suggests that you can use Incognito mode "to plan surprises like gifts or birthdays," but they're not fooling anyone; the bloggers call it "porn mode."
For more of the technological details about Chrome security, Google has created what may be the most innovative feature of all: an utterly charming comic book - yes, a comic book - that explains the browser and its features.
Already, speculation is running rampant online. Will Chrome catch on? What about Google's business relationships with its competitors?
And above all: What is Google up to?
Is it trying to build a platform for running the software of the future, thereby de-emphasizing Windows and other operating systems?
That's a yes. Google even went to the trouble of rewriting Javascript, the programming language that underlies many such online programs. According to online Javascript speed tests, Google's version is twice as fast as Internet Explorer 7.
Will Google ensure that its own services run better in Chrome than in other browsers? Is this part of Google's great conspiracy?
That's a no and a no. Chrome is based on open-source programming, meaning that its code is available to everyone for inspection or improvement - even to its rivals. That's a huge, promising twist that ought to shut up the conspiracy theorists.
For now, it's best to think of Chrome as exactly what it purports to be: a promising, modern, streamlined, nonbloated, very secure alternative to the browsers currently available. You should do exactly what Microsoft, Apple and the Firefox folks will all be doing: Try it out and keep your eye on it.
Because every now and then, Google's fresh approach ends up dominating its once much bigger competitors (See also: Ask, AltaVista, Lycos...)
Correction:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright © 2008 The International Herald Tribune | www.iht.com
By David Pogue
Thursday, September 4, 2008
Does the world really need another Web browser? Google thinks so. Chrome, its new browser, was developed in secrecy and released to the world Tuesday. The Windows version is available for download now at google.com/chrome; the Mac and Linux versions will take a little longer.
Google argues that current Web browsers were designed eons ago, before so many of the developments that characterize today's Web: video everywhere, scams and spyware, viruses that lurk even on legitimate sites, Web-based games and ambitious Web-based programs like Google's own Docs word processor.
As Google's blog puts it, "We realized that the Web had evolved from mainly simple text pages to rich, interactive applications and that we needed to completely rethink the browser."
What this early version of Chrome accomplishes isn't quite that grand. But it is a first-rate beginning.
With no status bar, no menu bar and only a single toolbar (for bookmarks), Chrome is minimalist in the extreme.
Some might even call it stripped-down. This initial version is labeled "beta," meaning still in testing. True, Google labels almost everything beta - the four-year-old Gmail program is still in beta - but this time it's serious.
At the moment, for example, there's no way to e-mail a Web page to someone, no full-screen mode, no way to magnify the page (rather than just the text), and no screen for organizing bookmarks. Google says that these features are at the top of its to-do list.
Chrome is, nonetheless, full of really smart features that seem to have been inspired by other browsers - or ripped off from them, depending on your level of cynicism.
Take the address bar. As you start to type, a menu of suggestions appears immediately beneath - a list culled not just from pages you have already visited, but also from your bookmarks, search suggestions and popular Web pages that you haven't been to before. That works even the first time you try it, since Chrome auto-imports your bookmarks, history and even stored passwords from your old browser. (See also: the similar address bars in Firefox and Internet Explorer 8, also now in beta testing.)
If you have ever searched Amazon, eBay, or other popular sites, another cool shortcut awaits. You can just type the site's first letter in the address bar and then press Tab. Do that with "A," for example, and the address bar changes to "Search amazon.com," allowing you to search within that site without even going there first. You've saved one big step.
As your start-up page, Chrome displays pictures of nine mini-Web pages, representing your most frequently visited sites. (See also: the Speed Dial feature on the Opera browser.)
This start-up page also lists several of your most recently visited sites and searches, making it a natural, time-saving starting point. (You can designate a more standard Home page if you prefer by clicking on the Options command that hides in one of the two menu icons.)
The "Create application shortcuts" command (also hiding in those menus) generates an icon on your desktop. When you click it, the corresponding site opens without the usual address bar and buttons - in other words, it now works exactly like a regular desktop program. For services like Gmail or blogging software, this feature further blurs the line between online and offline software.
Downloading files is really easy. A status button appears at the bottom of your browser window - there is no Downloads window to get in your way. You click that button to open the downloaded file, without having to worry about what folder it wound up in.
If you believe Google, though, the best stuff is all under the hood. For example, Google chose, as the underlying Web-page processing software, the same existing "rendering engine" inside Apple's Safari browser.
As a result, Chrome is quick - faster than Internet Explorer, although not quite as fast as Firefox or Safari. Since Chrome came out on Tuesday, I haven't had time to test it on all 40 billion Web pages on the Internet (I gave up around dinnertime).
Very few Web sites gave Chrome problems, though. NBCOlympics.com, for example, failed to recognize Chrome and therefore refused to play its videos, but that will change; nobody ignores Google these days.
Also under the hood are what Google considers some of Chrome's most important features - the security enhancements. Google says that each tab runs in its own "sandbox," so that if there's nasty spyware-type software running on one Web site, it has no access to the rest of your computer, or even the other tabs. Google asserts that this is much stronger protection than Internet Explorer 8 gives you, especially in Windows XP. (Internet Explorer 8 supplies its best protection only in Windows Vista.)
Also in the security category, something called Incognito mode, in which no cookies, passwords or cache files are saved, and the browser's History list records no trace of your activity. (See also: Safari, Internet Explorer 8.) Google cheerfully suggests that you can use Incognito mode "to plan surprises like gifts or birthdays," but they're not fooling anyone; the bloggers call it "porn mode."
For more of the technological details about Chrome security, Google has created what may be the most innovative feature of all: an utterly charming comic book - yes, a comic book - that explains the browser and its features.
Already, speculation is running rampant online. Will Chrome catch on? What about Google's business relationships with its competitors?
And above all: What is Google up to?
Is it trying to build a platform for running the software of the future, thereby de-emphasizing Windows and other operating systems?
That's a yes. Google even went to the trouble of rewriting Javascript, the programming language that underlies many such online programs. According to online Javascript speed tests, Google's version is twice as fast as Internet Explorer 7.
Will Google ensure that its own services run better in Chrome than in other browsers? Is this part of Google's great conspiracy?
That's a no and a no. Chrome is based on open-source programming, meaning that its code is available to everyone for inspection or improvement - even to its rivals. That's a huge, promising twist that ought to shut up the conspiracy theorists.
For now, it's best to think of Chrome as exactly what it purports to be: a promising, modern, streamlined, nonbloated, very secure alternative to the browsers currently available. You should do exactly what Microsoft, Apple and the Firefox folks will all be doing: Try it out and keep your eye on it.
Because every now and then, Google's fresh approach ends up dominating its once much bigger competitors (See also: Ask, AltaVista, Lycos...)
Correction:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright © 2008 The International Herald Tribune | www.iht.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)