The Joy of Trump

Vancouver Island Eyes on the World






Friday, March 1, 2019

David Pecker, Chief of National Enquirer's Publisher, Is Said to Get Immunity in Trump Inquiry

No thank you, Mr. Pecker

Something unusual happened to me yesterday. Actually, for me it wasn’t just unusual — it was a first. I was made an offer I couldn’t refuse. Or at least that’s what the top people at the National Enquirer thought. I’m glad they thought that, because it emboldened them to put it all in writing. Rather than capitulate to extortion and blackmail, I’ve decided to publish exactly what they sent me, despite the personal cost and embarrassment they threaten.

AMI, the owner of the National Enquirer, led by David Pecker, recently entered into an immunity deal with the Department of Justice related to their role in the so-called “Catch and Kill” process on behalf of President Trump and his election campaign. Mr. Pecker and his company have also been investigated for various actions they’ve taken on behalf of the Saudi Government.

And sometimes Mr. Pecker mixes it all together:

“After Mr. Trump became president, he rewarded Mr. Pecker’s loyalty with a White House dinner to which the media executive brought a guest with important ties to the royals in Saudi Arabia. At the time, Mr. Pecker was pursuing business there while also hunting for financing for acquisitions…”

Federal investigators and legitimate media have of course suspected and proved that Mr. Pecker has used the Enquirer and AMI for political reasons. And yet AMI keeps claiming otherwise:

“American Media emphatically rejects any assertion that its reporting was instigated, dictated or influenced in any manner by external forces, political or otherwise.”

Of course, legitimate media have been challenging that assertion for a long time:

Mystery Grows Over Pro-Saudi Tabloid: Embassy Got Sneak Peek

I didn’t know much about most of that a few weeks ago when intimate texts messages from me were published in the National Enquirer. I engaged investigators to learn how those texts were obtained, and to determine the motives for the many unusual actions taken by the Enquirer. As it turns out, there are now several independent investigations looking into this matter.

To lead my investigation, I retained Gavin de Becker. I’ve known Mr. de Becker for twenty years, his expertise in this arena is excellent, and he’s one of the smartest and most capable leaders I know. I asked him to prioritize protecting my time since I have other things I prefer to work on and to proceed with whatever budget he needed to pursue the facts in this matter.

Here’s a piece of context: My ownership of the Washington Post is a complexifier for me. It’s unavoidable that certain powerful people who experience Washington Post news coverage will wrongly conclude I am their enemy.

President Trump is one of those people, obvious by his many tweets. Also, The Post’s essential and unrelenting coverage of the murder of its columnist Jamal Khashoggi is undoubtedly unpopular in certain circles.

(Even though The Post is a complexifier for me, I do not at all regret my investment. The Post is a critical institution with a critical mission. My stewardship of The Post and my support of its mission, which will remain unswerving, is something I will be most proud of when I’m 90 and reviewing my life, if I’m lucky enough to live that long, regardless of any complexities it creates for me.)

Back to the story: Several days ago, an AMI leader advised us that Mr. Pecker is “apoplectic” about our investigation. For reasons still to be better understood, the Saudi angle seems to hit a particularly sensitive nerve.

A few days after hearing about Mr. Pecker’s apoplexy, we were approached, verbally at first, with an offer. They said they had more of my text messages and photos that they would publish if we didn’t stop our investigation.

My lawyers argued that AMI has no right to publish photos since any person holds the copyright to their own photos, and since the photos in themselves don’t add anything newsworthy.

AMI’s claim of newsworthiness is that the photos are necessary to show Amazon shareholders that my business judgment is terrible. I founded Amazon in my garage 24 years ago, and drove all the packages to the post office myself. Today, Amazon employs more than 600,000 people, just finished its most profitable year ever, even while investing heavily in new initiatives, and it’s usually somewhere between the #1 and #5 most valuable company in the world. I will let those results speak for themselves.
OK, back to their threat to publish intimate photos of me. I guess we (me, my lawyers, and Gavin de
Beck




Trump’s ability to avoid a genuine reckoning is no longer a foregone conclusion


George Conway‏ @gtconway3d




“Trump’s ability to avoid a genuine reckoning is no longer a foregone conclusion.... Prosecutors in the Southern District of New York are scrutinizing 
many aspects of his business.... Trump may end up wishing he had gone to Vietnam and stayed.”






Thursday, February 28, 2019

Michael Cohen Teztimony



Robert Reich‏Verified account @RBReich

The testimony of Michael Cohen alone suggests the president could be guilty of: 

—Conspiracy to defraud the United States. 
—Lying to the DOJ and the Special Counsel. 
 —Campaign finance violations. 
—Encouraging perjury. 
—State and local tax fraud. 

Let that sink in.

Wednesday, February 13, 2019

Guess Who


Guess Who: Balding billionaire, tiny hands, mushroom dick, obese, addle- brain, malignant narcissist, pathological liar,









Is Trump's Abstinence a Personality Disorder? | Psychology Today

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/addiction-in-society/201705/is-trumps-abstinence-personality-disorder




Is Trump's Abstinence a Personality Disorder?

A journalist's analysis suggests that abstaining presidents are suspect.


Posted May 31, 2017


In a 2007 column titled "The Deniers' Club" (a play on the best-selling novel The Liars' Club by recovering writer Mary Karr), highly respected New York magazine and public radio journalist Kurt Andersen attributes George W. Bush's dishonest representations about, and incompetent handling of, the Iraq War to Bush's having quit drinking without joining Alcoholics Anonymous. Thus the "denier" appellation.
I mean, who ceases drinking without AA? (Answer: A large majority of alcoholic Americans no longer drink alcoholically without going to AA, and most of them don't abstain.)
But President Donald Trump, whom I doubt that Andersen is more inclined to approve of than Bush, might cause us to re-evaluate the basis of Andersen's judgment that Bush's flaws are due to his quitting drinking on his own, without the benefits of AA membership.
President Trump's Abstinence

President Donald Trump isn't one to go along with the crowd. While the six other world leaders at the G7 summit — from Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan — walked together to take a group photo at a piazza on a Sicilian hilltop, President Trump rode a golf cart.

"Piazza," "Sicily" — makes you think of wine, doesn't it? Not Donald Trump. The president has famously never consumed a drop of alcohol in his life. Trump has claimed that he abstains because his brother Fred died from alcoholism. But Trump (who was nine years younger than Fred) would have become aware of his brother's drinking problem only in his own 20s — perhaps late 20s, since his brother's failures at his father's company, where Donald excelled, only became apparent in the years before Fred's death at 43.
Reuters
Source: Reuters
How many of the other G7 leaders — or for that matter, how many of the other leaders of the 28 NATO nations — abstained during official dinners? Do you think that Emmanuel Macron refused wine — or the heads of Luxembourg, Belgium, Switzerland, Italy, Spain, and Greece, along with leaders of other European nations?

While we're at it, do you think many of the Chinese leaders didn't toast during their elaborate state dinners?
I'll speculate there's a good chance that not a single European or Chinese leader abstains. (Surely some of them have had a close relative with a drinking problem.) In the case of German Chancellor Angela Merkel, we don't have to hypothesize. News photos show her toasting a long table at which everyone is hoisting a beer stein.

The German chancellor — a woman — drinks beer publicly!

Actually, so did Hillary Clinton. And Bill Clinton, despite having an alcoholic stepfather, also drank. Meanwhile, Barack (whose own father developed serious drinking problems) and Michelle Obama regularly drank — the movie about their first date, Southside With You, shows them having a beer together after seeing the movie, Do the Right Thing. And when the Obamas went out for a special evening, they each had a couple of fancy cocktails with dinner before seeing a Broadway show.

However, as noted by Andersen, the last Republican President prior to Trump, George W. Bush, also didn't drink — in his case, Bush decided to abstain because of issues he had had with drinking.
The American Abstinence Fixation
Abstinence from alcohol is common in the U.S. — more so than in any other Western nation. When abstinence is defined as drinking less frequently than once a month, almost half of Americans abstain.
If this figure seems high to those of us in New York, about one-third of people in Northeast states (which have large ethnic populations) abstain compared with around two-thirds in Southern states. There is a positive correlation between drinking and socio-economic status, so that better-off people are more likely to drink, but to drink moderately, in the U.S.

When looking at America's abstinence fixation, consider in how many other Western (European and English-speaking) countries drinking is legally restricted to those 21 years of age and older. The answer: none. Even in non-Mediterranean countries, the typical drinking age is 18. In our northern neighbor, Canada, the country most like us, the drinking age varies from province to province, but in none of them is it 21. That goes for all of Latin America, too.

What the hell is the matter with the rest of the world?

We may wonder whether French-speaking Quebec's drinking age is at the low or the high end of the spectrum for Canadian provinces. If you guessed "low" (meaning 18), you're right. In Southern European countries, on the other hand — France, Italy, Spain, Greece, Portugal — the general rule is that 16-year-olds can purchase and drink beer and wine. And in cafes and restaurants, the rule of thumb is that children of any age can sip wine with their families.

So Trump's abstinence from alcohol is not unusual for Americans, even as it sets him — and us — apart from the rest of the economically advanced countries on the planet.
Kurt Andersen's Deniers' Club and Trump

However dubious is Andersen's argument that abstaining without going to AA explains George W. Bush's botched international forays, his hypothesis makes no sense whatsoever in Trump's case, since Trump never had a drinking problem. Instead, adding Trump to the Bush mix suggests an alternative hypothesis — you can't trust the judgment of anyone who doesn't drink. After all, if they can't control themselves, how can we count on them to navigate our country's fortunes?
In the meantime, we might also consider our current President's health in relationship to his abstinence, since he is obese as well and eschews exercise. That is, older Americans like Trump who are lifetime abstainers have a significantly higher death rate than drinkers: "The rates of death from all cardiovascular diseases were 30 to 40 percent lower among men and women reporting at least one drink daily than among nondrinkers, with little relation to the level of consumption." (Shhhh! You're not allowed to know that!)
And, so, our best conclusion is not Anderson's idea that quitting drinking without AA's help causes dangerous and self-deceptive behavior. It's simply abstinence that causes these dangerous personal traits.
Afterword:
Submitted by Gregory Bogosian:
Instead, adding Trump to the Bush mix suggests an alternative hypothesis — you can't trust the judgment of anyone who doesn't drink. After all, if they can't control themselves, how can we count on them to navigate our country's fortunes? 
So Buzz Aldrin, Muhammed Ali, Isaac Asimov, Warren Buffet, Joe Biden — none of them can be trusted.
Stanton responds:
Gregory, The next generation of Asimovs is quite interesting. Eric Asimov, Isaac's nephew, is wine columnist for the NY Times. Since Isaac abstained from alcohol, it's ironic, don't you think? I wonder what family dynamic brought that about.
David Asimov, Isaac's son is a sad story: could it have anything to do with Isaac's fears about self-control?
For all of his 47 years, David Asimov has lived deep in the gargantuan shadow of his late father, Isaac Asimov. . . Last week, the younger Asimov achieved his own unwanted notoriety when Santa Rosa police arrested him after searching his home and discovering what investigators say may be the biggest child pornography collection in Sonoma County history.
Could wine have helped that family dynamic?
I had a "bestseller" for Pacific Standard digital magazine entitled “The Truth We Won’t Admit: Drinking Is Healthy." This is its final paragraph:
Human beings have grown up alongside alcohol: Beverage alcohol has been found at the site of every early center of civilization. The more alcohol a society consumes, the fewer alcohol-related problems and alcohol-related deaths (including cirrhosis) it has, since these societies, such as those in Southern Europe, integrate drinking with social life. And alcohol conveys health benefits. If you cannot drink (or believe that you cannot), you probably increase your likelihood of early death. If so, I am truly sorry for you.
Gregory, Isn't Armenia a wine culture? And it goes without saying, I don't want you to drink!
 __________________________
Mary is concerned that I ignored women's situations:
The mortality from breast cancer was 30 percent higher among women reporting at least one drink daily than among nondrinkers (relative risk, 1.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 1.6).
I commend Mary for clicking into the original study, which appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine, and comprises the largest prospective study of life and death among drinkers (a half-million men and women over the age of 50). Anti-alcohol people often claim these studies are funded by the alcohol industry (it was funded by the American Heart Association).
And, as I said, the study found that women who drank had a significantly lower death rate than those who abstained, as I reminded Mary:
Women who drank lived longer than women who didn't drink. This occurred since "death from all cardiovascular diseases were 30 to 40 percent lower among men and women reporting at least one drink daily drink," and 10 times as many women die of heart disease as breast cancer. If you have breast cancer in your family, that does change the equation in ways that haven't been calculated — otherwise, the odds favor your living longer if you drink.
I then added:
Mary, don't take this the wrong way — I don't want you to drink!
To which Mary replied:
Teetotaler.
No worries, I am a non-drinker. Never liked or acquired the taste of alcohol. I am one of those who will participate in the toast, raising the glass, but not imbibing (which is perfectly acceptable social behavior during a toast) of that awful sherry.
Unfortunately, I had to inform Mary:
You know, don't you, that when one person doesn't drink during a toast that the exact opposite of the toasted outcome occurs: the marriage isn't long and happy, the graduate doesn't succeed in life, and the baby — well, I won't speculate. (By the way, Mary, you certainly must avoid a Jewish bris, where they put wine on the baby's lips!)

About the Author






Monday, February 11, 2019

Nancy Pelosi "Claps" in Trump's FACE - Here's What REALLY Happened



  
Nancy owned the Bully


Did you catch the exaggerated, alligator-like hand clap which House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi directed toward President Trump during a portion of
his State of the Union address? 

It was a highly public, somewhat sarcastic swipe by Pelosi, as if to
say, "It's about time you said that," or "Your actions don't fit your
words, buddy!" 

Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer seem to have discovered
that getting the best of Trump involves engaging in the same type of
"bare knuckle" political mud wrestling which the President mastered long
ago. 


 This  may well both b e the "new politics" strategy in this day and age which
becomes normal practice for elected officials of parties. 

We can all run into instances where we too are demeaned, belittled,
called a name, or, in sum, become a victim of trash talk. 

It is important to develop a system to respond to this type of verbal
attack effectively and consistently, warding off and even overpowering
the aggressor. 

Watch this video which reviews the significance of the "Pelosi Clap,"
and also gets you started in preparing yourself to squash trash talk
ambushes.

-- 

Here's everything that goes into making my videos: https://goo.gl/WFMcXA

*** 

 from The Charisma Matrix: *** 


The Charisma Matrix Webpage: http://www.CharismaMatrix.com 

The Vocal Power BOOTCAMP: https://VocalPowerBootcamp.com 

Social Invincibility Program: http://www.SocialInvincibility.com 


Vocal Power and Tonality Masterclass: https://goo.gl/vhh2Qq 








Sunday, February 10, 2019